Forums Index >> Armies >> Think you can defeat the "Big Five" Armies? Come i...



Page : <1> : 2


Heh I see there are many new armies, and many are becoming very top-notch! The "Big Five" Armies are the top 5 armies in TT, which include: UF, SA, ST, DAS, and XTL! These armies are the toughest of them all, and if one army that is not a "Big Five" , can defeat a Big Five, they may take that army's place as a Big Five!! Here you will find the battle records of the Big Five? Think you can win? Test your luck, eh?!

Win:Loss Each win is one win on one army

UF BATTLE RECORD
10:0 (Probably the top army at the moment)

SA BATTLE RECORD
6:2 ?

ST BATTLE RECORD
3:0 Mostly TS Army

DAS BATTLE RECORD
4:0 Mostly BM army

XTL BATTLE RECORD
2:1

I will put more information later, but if you think you can fight one of these armies, I believe you can go ahead and challenge them!

-AO

That's another whippersnapper belted by the feared AncientOne!

Last edited: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 5:01:02 PM

Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 5:28:47 PM

Our record is 7-5 even though thats not good, I believe we are the best of the newer armies ;)

Leader of the Vigilante Tanks! May Vigilance Carry On!

Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 5:39:28 PM

^^ Oy! No offense but can you please get rid of the "EX GL SF WT" thing? We are ONE army now, not a combined group. :)

Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 6:55:01 PM

[brag]I believe we are the best of the newer armies [/brag] Lol Vig... :P
--
@ AO : thx for this :)

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 10:12:45 PM

ST does not have any losses...
We beated:
SA, UT, TX (back in the old days) and add VT because otherwise you ll have to add it later on :P

Scythe

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 6:29:32 AM

Ooooo I know I will ask USS if we can vs DAS to a team scrum compatition.

my blaster will destroy u!

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 11:23:08 AM

@ ^^
when did you beat SA ? 8o

 

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 1:57:59 PM

@ All armies Beware ST has no Skill only major Luck bomb.< whatever that is... Standard issue for all ST!

 

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 3:06:11 PM

^^^^^^ Hey! We stand a chance! The best Bmer u have is...........No good BMers? :P

Leader of the Vigilante Tanks! May Vigilance Carry On!

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 3:47:11 PM

ST Beat SA in a game of luck, that's all, because that is what scrum is, a game of chance and luck, and that is why I hate scrum for army battles, because we leave too much to chance...

I refered the term luck bomb, because within 2 mins in the game, the score was already 8-1, and there was no possible way to overcome such luck.....

And I would hardly even consider it a fair loss, but heck, SA is ready and willing to Take ST in both BM and CTF, where there is no room for luck, only skill! B)

**..::I am thoroughly... amused:::..**

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 4:39:04 PM

 

 

That is what scrum is, a game of chance and luck

 


Please, you and I both know skill has a main part in TS,
along with Team Work !

 

Because within 2 mins in the game, the score was already 8-1, and there was no possible way to overcome such luck.....

 


Now, no offence but I was just wondering,
if you really read what you wrote ?

 

Because within 2 mins in the game, the score was already 8-1, and there was no possible way to overcome such luck...

 


Last time I checked,
there is 15 minutes in a game.
You stated,

 

within 2 mins in the game

 


So what happen to the other 13 minutes ?
Not picking a fight just wondering ! 8o

 

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 6:32:11 PM

Thank you LW.

When I first read the comment of CADC I was going to post something but I stopped myself because I knew a Veteran from PSL would soon answer him.

Team work and Skill is what gave us that big jump in points during that last game. ST's were ready and in the zone (T-34 and Jay did some super work). Only 15% of the duration of the game was done and SA's all started messaging we give up, you guys are too lucky and other comments of that type.

I was wondering why couldn't they of been true fighters and not give up?

I think that in defeat be a gentleman and admit that the other team was better, leave the accomplishment to those that succeed. Don't belittle it by claiming false facts (chance) to redeem yourself.

Will SA's be more professionnal next time we meet them?
Will they act with respect for all involved?
Will they be on time?
Will they be ready with their roster and who plays , who sits?
Will they stick to the decided upon RULES of ENGAGEMENT?

Leaders of SA answer us and you will have your chance and playing us again. ST's loved the gaming part of those 1,5 to 2 hours of time it took to play 3 games of 15 minutes (45 minutes total). Think about this.

 

Thursday, May 18, 2006 at 5:27:38 AM

Thats actually very good Delta, on the PSL8 leagues its usually 2-3 games and they take up to an hour!

 

 

 

 

Thursday, May 18, 2006 at 8:46:48 AM

^Pedro it was 3 games for a total time of close to 2 hours, that's not good. Now maybe It's more clear.

 

Thursday, May 18, 2006 at 8:52:01 AM

@ Lone= heh, u had to been there to understand

@ Delta= u'r right, it was a fair game, and so I'll await u'r reply for our next TBM war B)

**..::I am thoroughly... amused:::..**

Thursday, May 18, 2006 at 9:34:57 AM

Thanks Lone.
Good post Delta.

Thursday, May 18, 2006 at 9:36:55 AM

[small unoticed voice] Round two was a luck bomb for you guys thanks to all them freebies. No ST was complanining about that when we lost thanks to 3 freebs (it was actually 4 but we got a freeb too so I took away one) [/small unoticed voice]... Just something to think about

I dont know about some of you guys but I'm getting sick of all this talk about why and how ST just got by SA thanks to luck. Its pathetic and bad sportsmanship. You wanted a war so bad cadc that you came to us and we won. And now you and SA want to make a big deal about round three where that ST (congrats, to the ST group who played that round) owned, and you want to say that it was mere luck! Doesn't make sense what so ever. I say a win is a win and a loss is a loss. Anything in between, like teamwork or strategy, goes between the leaders and his/her army
.

 

Last edited: Friday, May 19, 2006 at 7:16:08 AM

Friday, May 19, 2006 at 7:06:47 AM

Then what are we waiting for.

Let's get this TBm, CTF, and TS match on the go! B)

Friday, May 19, 2006 at 1:02:30 PM

^ actually, it's just TBM and CTF that's left tanky :P

**..::I am thoroughly... amused:::..**

Friday, May 19, 2006 at 7:17:26 PM

@ Cadc & his fellow SA's:
At first I want to say that it is very weak to argue about ST and it's victory when I was not home. I ve spend the last days in Amsterdamn in the Netherlands.

Now to the crap that cadc posted:

 

ST Beat SA in a game of luck, that's all, because that is what scrum is, a game of chance and luck, and that is why I hate scrum for army battles, because we leave too much to chance...

I refered the term luck bomb, because within 2 mins in the game, the score was already 8-1, and there was no possible way to overcome such luck.....

And I would hardly even consider it a fair loss, but heck, SA is ready and willing to Take ST in both BM and CTF, where there is no room for luck, only skill!

 

You always seem to forget that nothing is agreed about CTF nor TBM. The only reason that TS is a game of luck (and yea you guys would have never won the second game without your 4 FB's turning into three because I took one myself). And we never reached 8-1 in 2 minutes, get ur facts straight. In fact you guys had the most luck, not us, we fought for it because we are a team. You guys are a bunch of skilled people acting like a team.
I thought a veteran player like you could take a loss, but now I see that there always are whiners. I came back from Halo because of the whining there, and now I see a person that I used to respect whining about something that is his own dumb fault.

How dare you considering that TS is a game luck!

Now the fact that many ST's have had trouble with SA's. And your lack of trying to do anything against this!
1. Mr Big Show has sweared to Paisano for no reason (as usual) right in front of you face.
2. I ve had a major incident with Lost or should I say [CENSORED]
3. I ve had an incident with you, calling ST's noobs and I compared you with Lost (which you did not like for some reason, are u ashamed for him? :o)
4. 1Monkey SA was kinda playing against me in TS while being on the same team (with camping against me).

Now the fact that your banlist just aint a banlist, that we (ST) don't like the kind of leadership in SA makes that the chance of a game in TBM or CTF maybe neither TS is very little. Because we just are not a TBM or CTF clan, which are following you, the games of pure skill (What a bullshit).

Should I explain the banlist to you cadc? Or do you get the picture?
About your leadership, in ST we r just not used to your methods. You want revenge, come and get it on TS.

Why would we play, we all know you ll come back whining!

ScytheMan

Last edited: Saturday, May 20, 2006 at 11:38:35 AM

Saturday, May 20, 2006 at 11:37:14 AM

ST doesn't like the way we run our army. We should feel ashamed of ourselves, their opinion means everything in the world to us.

 

About your leadership, in ST we r just not used to your methods

 

Ok, you guys aren't used to it, does it matte, though? Your in a completely different army.

Here's a great idea I just cracked up: You worry about your army, we worry about ours.

Now, ST has a lot of well mannered kind players (aztec, pedro, jay, t-34, etc.) but you posting something like that really lowers ST in my eyes at least. Not that you'd care, and you shouldn't care, because I'm not in your army.

I could just as easilly nit-pick on things ST needs to improve and come up with my own little list. Alot of those things on your list is from months and months ago. I have no idea how you can still remember that and hold onto it.

I honostely wouldn't know anything about the second and third game because I wasn't there. But what I do know is that it is an ST victory nevertheless, no matter how much or little luck was involved for each team. It happens.

Quite honostely, alot of it had to be skill on ST's part. ST is a major scrum army, and BM and CTF are not their strong suits at all (no offense meant, it's just a fact). SA is more of an all-around team. Their best chance of beating us would be in scrum, which turned out to be true.

We're not going to only play you only in TS, because that's another disadvantage on our part. Since we're an all around team, we want to play TBM as well, maybe CTF. And hey, since there was a lot of controversy about luck in the TS match we had, we'll throw that in our war as well. A win is a win.

I've been told many times by many people that ST doesn't like negociating with me because of "verbal harrassment" on my part. That may very well be true, and even though I'm not leader, I'm still going to defend the members of SA.

I really don't want any arguments coming in my direction, but I welcome comments on my post. I'm not the representative of SA, so if your gonna fight, fight with someone who has authority.

Tankster

Last edited: Saturday, May 20, 2006 at 12:10:10 PM

Saturday, May 20, 2006 at 12:07:46 PM

@ Tankster:
That is very pollite and well said, and yes I was one of the ST's complaining about that.
Maybe I should explain SA's banlist because it is more like a member list
Although you guys just kicked Evocati (SA) also known as Kristoffer
There is still someone in your team, which got kicked in ST, who's name is also on the banlist.

Now some other facts your referring too:
All incidents were in a very near period of time, I got emailed about Mr Big Shows most annoying insults to Paisano [b]in front of cadc(SA/UF/SM) . How come he did not do anything about it? Is it some sort of revenge from SA? Maybe he is angry because off the loss.. I don't know but that kind of leadership is something I do not tolerate, meaning that I don't want to have anything to do with SA. 1Monkey did (try) to bump me twice, he got me once the first time while I was driving backwards and he did not take the scrum (it fell off though) but I grabbed it and drove back and he came again, to late luckily (it was NOT A FB! ).

To explain the thingy I had with cadc, I have to explain the banlist I m talking about. I won't until cadc says I can!
@ cadc: editing it will not help, I have taken a screenshot!

Scythe

Saturday, May 20, 2006 at 12:30:01 PM

@SA complainers and ST complainers,

Both of you, live with it. I don't care if someone won the game through a "luck bomb" or if there were numerous fbs in the round before. NONE OF THIS HAS TO DO WITH THIS THREAD! Also why must you all complain of such pointless things? ST won, SA lost, that's how it goes. Do not get mad if they won, through luck or skill, for SA lost. Be happy, and get ready for TBM! And ST, if someone complaining about you, don't bring up other things against them! Just let them rant on, and try not to fight back. Fighting back makes things worse! And Scytheman, I suggest you change some of your words to appriate words (bull sh*t). You are all mature enough to not blame each other of such things.

-AO

That's another whippersnapper belted by the feared AncientOne!

Saturday, May 20, 2006 at 12:54:19 PM

You have to give things a name Ancient One, if bullsh*t is the correct term for it then name it like that.
But I have already thought about what you said, this thread has nothing to do with it. It just got victimized by cadc all mighty.

Scythe

Saturday, May 20, 2006 at 1:11:14 PM

I think ST desevred that win fair and square, and if they didn't, it was my fault for poking my nose in. Happy?

Saturday, May 20, 2006 at 1:15:39 PM

Jeezzz.... ST won... That's all to it.

Saturday, May 20, 2006 at 11:29:03 PM

People who aren't involved, stay not involved.

Thanks for keeping cool on me scythe. I have to also thank you for pointing out Evocati was kristoffer. We had no idea. He never was on much or talked much so we couldn't get a good sense.

And about the banlist, we know what we put there, and we chose to keep it just to show the person that if he ever turns out that way again, it will apply. Hard to explain.

I'm ready for a three way war. Sound good? This isn't what the threads about, so we'll start posting in the SA and ST threads.

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 11:31:16 AM

@ Sythe:

 

Editing it will not help, I have taken a screenshot!

 

Editing... Editing what, exactly?

I say

 

@ Delta= u'r right, it was a fair game, and so I'll await u'r reply for our next TBM war

 

And that's the reply I get?? Tyvm :(

**..::I am thoroughly... amused:::..**

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 11:46:44 AM

 

 

Now the fact that many ST's have had trouble with SA's. And your lack of trying to do anything against this!
1. Mr Big Show has sweared to Paisano for no reason (as usual) right in front of you face.
2. I ve had a major incident with Lost or should I say [CENSORED]
3. I ve had an incident with you, calling ST's noobs and I compared you with Lost (which you did not like for some reason, are u ashamed for him? )
4. 1Monkey SA was kinda playing against me in TS while being on the same team (with camping against me).

Now the fact that your banlist just aint a banlist, that we (ST) don't like the kind of leadership in SA

 

What kind of bull is that?! Sure no army has my kind of dicipline (me as an individual, but u figured that one out, right?), but I've never called anyone a noob , in all my years of playing online games. I've never cursed, I've always played by the game ethiquets, and u say I've insulted u and u'r army some how??

And about Big Show and Paisano, I wasn't paying much attention to the comversation, as I was paying more attention to the game, as most of us should, but from what I gathered from Paisano was that Big Show said "fu." u know, if I had a dollar for everytime I've seen that on the internet, I'd be rich beyond words. U know, there's a new invention called the ignore script, ever heard of it? It's perhaps the best thing that's ever happened to TT, why not installed?! Is it a crime? Have I done something to prevent ya from D-loading it?!

................................................................
.................................................................
.............................................................
............................................................
..................................................................

Sry if this changes anything in our friendship (if there's any of it left), I hope we can resolve this issue in a far more mature way , and still be friends.

Later Sythe

 

**..::I am thoroughly... amused:::..**

Last edited: Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 12:32:49 PM

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 12:17:36 PM

^ Is that blaming me or thanking me?

I didn't say much, man. Come back to TT, be the guy you were.

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 12:20:32 PM

^ thanking you, and a justification really, I want to make it known That I'm kind, but not as passive as I used to be B)

**..::I am thoroughly... amused:::..**

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 12:23:59 PM

@ AO,

The Greatest Army TT has ever seen is here to request a challenge of those armies mighty enough to take on KI. Firstly I will take on the best player XTL has to offer, then I will work my way up to UF. When I finish I will be the last tank standing.

SK

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 12:45:47 PM

Refering to me eh cadc? So what if I called someone a "noob" It wasnt at all serious but was taken the wrong way. I now talk to wOOt in Roo's servers and thats in the past.

Thanks for the kind words tankster!

 

 

 

 

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 12:51:16 PM

@ Pedro= hmmm....? What ya mean? 8o

@ SK= now this is something I gotta see B)

**..::I am thoroughly... amused:::..**

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 12:55:40 PM

@ CADC,

I have put the offer out there for the armies to respond. I wonder if XTL will accept my challenge??

SK

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:02:19 PM

SK, you lookin for the best BM in each clan, the turnout will look something like this:

XTL: Player
DAS: Suriname, Dark Mumke, Ancient One, Willow
ST: no idea, haven't encountered them much in BM, maybe Scytheman.
SA: Cadc, Tankster, Big Show, Cloud, Lost, Dark Mumke, Suriname, Ancient One, 1monkey, jedirieb, dinoboy... ;)
UF: Lonewolf, Supra, wiz, etc.

LOL... Good luck ! XD

Last edited: Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:17:24 PM

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:10:06 PM

@Cadc,the incident with wOOt when I was in SA

 

 

 

 

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:15:07 PM

@ Tankster,

XTL - Player is a tough competitor and I am sure that he has learned something from playing me often, however I am sure that I can overcome his greatness.

DAS - Suri is a good competitor and will prove harder to beat than the other three. Willow is beatable, along with AO and DM.

ST - If you have no idea then I surely have even less

SA - CADC will be the person to beat in this army. One other notable good player is also 1Monkey. He is under rated and a solid player.

UF - To become the Greatest Army I will take on three matches. WIZ firstly, then LW, then I will take on Supra.

Long road ahead.... I guess I will start looking for Player.

SK

 

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:19:43 PM

You'll crack before ST XD

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:21:12 PM

Tankster,

Line them up and see for yourself as every army falls before me like a domino. Obviously you haven't seen my greatness.

SK

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:24:04 PM

@ SK= My wishes in a nutshell :P , good 1 on 1 with ya is something I wanted to do for a long time! My best wishes, I want 1 last crack at ya (and hopefully one we finally finish B) )

**..::I am thoroughly... amused:::..**

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:26:38 PM

@ Cadc:
Indeed your totally right about Big Show's "fu" to Paisano. But take a closer look to the causes and the reason of World War 1.
Causes were major incidents between superpowers:
Austria-Hungary <=> Russia: conflict on the balkans
Austria-Hungary <=> Italy: Southern-Tirol (if I spelled that right..)
Germany <=> France: Their conflict goes back to the treaty of Verdun (in 823 if im right)
Germany <=> Great Britan: They were both very active in colonies

Now the reason it has happened was because of the murder on the Austrian crown prince in Sarajevo (not 100% about the place).

That was just 1 victim in what would end in a war of 2 000 000 victims who had nothing to do with this.

We ST and SA have got a lot of problems lately, you could see it as the conflicts these countries had. Then the FU, could be just the reason.

Maybe you did not call us noobs, in these words. But we did have a conversation which ended up with you saying something meaning that.

I ll take your advice and from now on I shall ignore the SA's..

Scythe

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:28:19 PM

I'll host- I'll email the 2 of ya the pass if you want to. I can relock the server from the command line if anyone cracks it.

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:29:21 PM

 

 

I ll take your advice and from now on I shall ignore the SA's..

 

This is not what I mean Sythe, what I'm saying is simply just ignore Big Show if it really is that big of a deal :)

**..::I am thoroughly... amused:::..**

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:31:21 PM

@ DJ,

Thanks for the offer, I will send you emails as I line up the matches.

@ Tankster,

Yes I have played and beat Gilgamesh, is he someone I should be worried about??

SK

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:35:00 PM

Okay, so you've beat Gilgamesh. But what about Beowulf? :P (ignore lame joke if you don't get it)

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:36:36 PM

@ DJ,

And when I beat SA I will have conquered the Smurfs 2. :)

SK

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:40:43 PM

Idk. Player coolboy and don vito are good.

Pray to GOD for him to reveal himself to you.

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:41:39 PM

@ SK= u just don't know how to keep u'r only advantages, lmao XD

So let me get this streight, this is just 1 on 1s right? :o

**..::I am thoroughly... amused:::..**

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 1:54:27 PM

Linux vs. Windows (you use Windows, right, Cadc?)... Who'll win?

Sunday, May 21, 2006 at 2:15:47 PM

Page : <1> : 2

insert quote insert url insert email insert image bold italic underline superscript subscript horizontal rule : : Help on using forum codes

Add comment:

HTML is disabled within comments, but ZBB Code is enabled.

Back to the top

Web site designed, maintained and funded by -z- and Dan MacDonald