Plz. Leaders (and co-leaders) of all the newer armies .

Welcome on this meeting about what new-army is the best.
Firstly. I have to say, that it doesn't really matter what army is the best. It doesn't matter how many (practice-)wars a army has won.
Its the loyality and the etiquette of the members. And the competentness of the leader that counts.

Secondly. You don't have to lie about how many wars your army has won/lost. It only gives your army a bad reputation.
Thirthly. Always make sure that your army shows up in (practice-)war. The worst that can happen is a no-show.
Fourthly. Make sure your army's members have a account on PTT and log on at least once a 3 days.
Fiftly. You are quite responsible about all your army's members do. Don't think <<Oh, well, he imposters, so what, he's a good TBM'er...>>
You have to think <<Uh-Oh, he imposters, his capaciabilities as TT'er dont even make sense now, direct kick.>>
Sixtly. Make sure you never post a password on PTT. Plz only give a password by e-mail or private forums . [credits LW]
Sevently. Make sure your army's members respect you, and like you. If they dont listen to you, they ain't loyal to your army!
Eightly (?). Make sure your army's first-post is always updated. And make sure that every piece of it is clear
Nightly (?). For the second time. Ranking of armies does not matter

Sencerencly,

Cassie (just trying to help, this post is not created to offend.

What I don't get about new armies is when they say something like "two week kick for such and such offence."

What does it mean? Do they just take their clan symbol out of their name for two weeks? That's not real punishment. IMO, a good punishment system goes like this:

First offence: Warning
Second offence: Warning #2
Third offence: Kicked from clan, allowed to rejoin in three months (or longer)
Fourth offence: If the member waits out that long monthly punishment, and joins again, another warning.
Final offence: LIFE BAN!

Ok pointless thread we really already settled this in Vigs thread if you read it!

And if there was no point in who's the best why do we have the big five armies huh? :'(

1. No, it hasn't. Since u and others are too ignorant to just shut up and play this game.
2. ^^^ has a point.
3. Racer, each armies rules and punishments vary, and each leader's have different opinions on making them.

^ why I think mi is better wrapped up in a nutshell XD

(sorry, couldn't resist)

Anyways, blizter is right. Each army does what each army does. I just wish (cough^^cough) they could do it a little more maturely. Good and needed thread Cas!

Lol.

Glad you agree with me. Same with the mature part, this is all just for fun.

Being a leader takes motivation and determination. If you don't have it, don't try to be a leader. Being a leader takes more than having fun.

-AO

^ Beleive it.

I made a speech today, the TT Civil Rights Movement was spoken today "I have a dream! A dream that all armies would become equals, none would fight, it wouldnt matter about their stupid names, or their ugly skins, I had a Dream!" lol well, I wrote something like that in the tw army thread cuz of an accedent I caused to make tw split in 2.

I AGREE!!!!!! THE TOP FIVE ARMYS DONT MATTER!!!!!!!! THE REASON FOR AN ARMY IS TO MAKE A GOOD TEAM, HAVE FUN AND GET TO KNOW EACHOTHER!!!! MAKE AN ARMY IF YOU WANT, BUT I WILL NEVER CARE ABOUT THE TOP FIVE ARMYS!!!! ARMYS ARE FOR FUN IN MY OPINION!!!!!!!!!SO DONT GLOTE WITH YOUR SEEMINGLY SHINY REWARDS!!!!!JUST HAVE FUN!!!!!!!!! ] Thank you all armys and army leaders.

Last edited: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 at 4:35:41 AM