WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administration has been carrying out secret reconnaissance missions to learn about nuclear, chemical and missile sites in Iran in preparation for possible airstrikes there, journalist Seymour Hersh said Sunday.

The effort has been under way at least since last summer, Hersh said on CNN's "Late Edition."

In an interview on the same program, White House Communications Director Dan Bartlett said the story was "riddled with inaccuracies."

"I don't believe that some of the conclusions he's drawing are based on fact," Bartlett said.

Iran has refused to dismantle its nuclear program, which it insists is legal and is intended solely for civilian purposes. (Full story)

Hersh said U.S. Officials were involved in "extensive planning" for a possible attack -- "much more than we know."

"The goal is to identify and isolate three dozen, and perhaps more, such targets that could be destroyed by precision strikes and short-term commando raids," he wrote in "The New Yorker" magazine, which published his article in editions that will be on newsstands Monday.

Hersh is a veteran journalist who was the first to write about many details of the abuses of prisoners Abu Ghraib in Baghdad.

He said his information on Iran came from "inside" sources who divulged it in the hope that publicity would force the administration to reconsider.

"I think that's one of the reasons some of the people on the inside talk to me," he said.

Hersh said the government did not answer his request for a response before the story's publication, and that his sources include people in government whose information has been reliable in the past.

Hersh said Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld view Bush's re-election as "a mandate to continue the war on terrorism," despite problems with the U.S.-led war in Iraq.

Last week, the effort to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq -- the Bush administration's stated primary rationale for the war -- was halted after having come up empty.

The secret missions in Iran, Hersh said, have been authorized in order to prevent similar embarrassment in the event of military action there. (Full story)

"The planning for Iran is going ahead even though Iraq is a mess," Hersh said. "I think they really think there's a chance to do something in Iran, perhaps by summer, to get the intelligence on the sites."

He added, "The guys on the inside really want to do this."

Hersh identified those inside people as the "neoconservative" civilian leadership in the Pentagon. That includes Rumsfeld, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Undersecretary of Defense Doug Feith -- "the sort of war hawks that we talk about in connection with the war in Iraq."

And he said the preparation goes beyond contingency planning and includes detailed plans for air attacks:

"The next step is Iran. It's definitely there. They're definitely planning... But they need the intelligence first."

Emphasizing 'diplomatic initiatives'

Bartlett said the United States is working with its European allies to help persuade Iran not to pursue nuclear weapons.

Asked if military action is an option should diplomacy fail, Bartlett said, "No president at any juncture in history has ever taken military options off the table."

But Bush "has shown that he believes we can emphasize the diplomatic initiatives that are under way right now," he said.

Hersh said U.S. Officials believe that a U.S. Attack on Iran might provoke an uprising by Iranians against the hard-line religious leaders who run the government. Similar arguments were made ahead of the invasion of Iraq, when administration officials predicted U.S. Troops would be welcomed as liberators.

And Hersh said administration officials have chosen not to include conflicting points of view in their deliberations -- such as predictions that any U.S. Attack would provoke a wave of nationalism that would unite Iranians against the United States.

"As people say to me, when it comes to meetings about this issue, if you don't drink the Kool-Aid, you can't go to meetings," he said. "That isn't a message anybody wants to hear."

The plans are not limited to Iran, he said.

"The president assigned a series of findings and executive orders authorizing secret commando groups and other special forces units to conduct covert operations against suspected terrorist targets in as many as 10 nations in the Middle East and South Asia," he wrote.

Under the secret plans, the war on terrorism would be led by the Pentagon, and the power of the CIA would be reduced, Hersh wrote in his article.

"It's sort of a great victory for Donald Rumsfeld, a bureaucratic victory," Hersh told CNN.

He said: "Since the summer of 2002, he's been advocating, 'Let me run this war, not the CIA. We can do it better. We'll send our boys in. We don't have to tell their local military commanders. We don't have to tell the ambassadors. We don't have to tell the CIA station chiefs in various countries. Let's go in and work with the bad guys and see what we can find out.'"

Hersh added that the administration has chipped away at the CIA's power and that newly appointed CIA Director Porter Goss has overseen a purge of the old order.

"He's been committing sort-of ordered executions'" Hersh said. "He's been -- you know, people have been fired, they've been resigning."

The target of the housecleaning at the CIA, he said, has been intelligence analysts, some of whom are seen as "apostates -- as opposed to being true believers."

"Spring cleaning for bush"

 

 

 

Lol
eagle

 

 

 

 

LOL. I suppose it could have been worse....Seymour could have instructed everyone to "drink the kool-aid....."

A quick question: who is Seymour Hersh and why should I give a crap what he thinks?

This belongs in the "Wingnut Alert" thread....on the left side.

It's kinda funny when US want to change the things at Middle East. Not saying that Saddam was good, but Middle East is the place where 'developed culture' has started. US is now like the old Europe was before.

 

 

And I thought this might shine a little more light on the subject.

 

 

So maybe we're just scoping it out for Israel. They're already hit a similar nuclear site in Iraq back in 1981, so I wouldn't be surprised if they were preparing to do the same, just in case diplomacy fails.

 

Last edited: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 10:18:37 AM

Who knew tanty actually could make sense? XD.Anyway,It is for good reason.There are WMDs in Iran.And insurgents fleeing from Iraq.Its just like a game of cat and mouse.You want to catch the mouse before it gets into the hole.

Re: Hersh - Did he first write about Abu Ghraib when it happened and the Army gave a couple press conferences about it; or was he the first to talk about it when the pictures came out 2 months later?

@Rabban: Interesting article. Good read.

THANK YOU ONE AND ALL ;)

Oh Shutup tanty. WHO HERE HATES BUSH? XD

I LOVE BUSH

HE'S A GREAT SOURCE FOR ENTERTAINMENT

HE ATTACKS COUNTRIES WHO POSE NO THREAT TO THE USA

HE MAKES RAG HEADS HATE AMERICA

HE BUILDS ALQEDA

HE LET OSAMA GET AWAY

HE'S BEST FRIENDS WITH SAUDI ARABIA

YOU GOTTA LOVE HIM !!!!!! ;)

It tickles ,just SHUTUP.you are a hopeless case and now I too gonna stop argueing with you before the mods ban me from the forums.