Forums Index >> Armies >> there's a new top 5.:)
Page : <1> :
Whether it's biased is another matter altogether, evidently.
If Chong was'nt playng with you , you could have lost. B)
</</div>
Firstly, that's a Top-6.
Secondly, not everything is about wars. An army goes about dedicatement, trust, fairplay, following rules, activity & wars/practices.
From what I know:
- 3/4 of your members is on my banlist - - *following rules scrapped*
- 1/4 of your members is inactive - - *dedicated semi-scrapped*
- 1/2 of your members does not post at PTT - - *activity PTT scrapped*
- I've had an incident whit 2 OC-members, shouting at eachother at my server (was about something ranks) - - *trust scrapped*
- And I cannot find a Win-Lose--static in your header, so that means W: 1 (MA) | L: 0 () - - *to less wars: wars semi-scrapped*
You have NOT proven to be a T-5-A! In other words, start working 8o
Thirdly,
SA-FI-UF-VT-MA.
SA-FI-UF-VT-MA.
Is that in order??
SA, UF, and Fi should be on 4, 5, and 6 cause these teams hardly play agianst other armies. The Armies that hardly play should be going down cause they never prove themselves as being the best.
</</div>
^^No, that's not in order... :P
:'(
Cas me and USS agreed so don't start getting all blah blah bout my army. Just leave my army alone. And all my inactive people are banned and all my main (general) people are on holiday/church or grounded. So..
- 3/4 of your members is on my banlist - - *following rules scrapped*
You never give them a chance.
1/4 of your members is inactive - - *dedicated semi-scrapped*
I see about 5 of my people a day. So...
1/2 of your members does not post at PTT - - *activity PTT scrapped*
Haven't you noticed that more of my people are posting on my thread. I have told them to and there E-mail is comin. If you look at the thread you will see more people are posting.
Cas stop trying to get my Army to be (crap). Leave my army alone. Me and USS have already made a desicion. And I am trying to do everything I can to get them active (they r), post on PTT (most of them are)
my blaster will destroy u!
Maybe it should be the BIG 3 and the little 5 :P
Umm.... When have people had the aurthority to make themselves in "T-5-A"? Its not up to the people in front to let you in.... It's what the majority of PTT and TT players think.... Wether you think you deserve to be in it or not is irrelevant....
Cassie gave valid physical evidence of her reasons, why she thinks your army doesnt deserve to be in T-5...So show us your proof which says otherwise......
To be honest there is no top 5, only a top 3 anyway... So all this is irrelevant
Ok..
Maybe scythe's idea is the best. J/k. (I honestly think we should use scythe's idea).
my blaster will destroy u!
Maybe it should be the BIG 3 and the little 5
Very true
To be honest there is no top 5, only a top 3 anyway... So all this is irrelevant
Same
When have people had the aurthority to make themselves in "T-5-A"?
Never, <<It's what the majority of PTT and TT players think...>> is very true
---
@ Des: No, I don't give more chances to spammers (they repeat a sentence like 4/5 times, when you don't awnser in a sec!)
They have spend their chances. Oh, a little thank you for hosting would not cost very much typing...
Is that in order??
UF at #3... Makes you think.
SA, UF, and Fi should be on 4, 5, and 6 cause these teams hardly play agianst other armies. The Armies that hardly play should be going down cause they never prove themselves as being the best.
You have a lot to learn... The records:
UF: 9 to 0
SA: 6 to 2 (ST, which is part of Fi, and UF)
Fi: 6 to 0 (ST), 16 roses (DAS, roses are added for each win, and taken away for each loss. DAS started out with 5, and by the end, they had 16.)
And HA's record? It's not in the old thread, did you delete it out of shame?
Last edited: Monday, July 31, 2006 at 4:30:06 AM
I haven't vs UF yet. Hmm..
my blaster will destroy u!
Hmm... But they've beaten 9 other armies. SA and UF had 2 wars (TBM, TS, and CTF), and they 2-0ed us.
Coolo. Well they obviously are great cause they have all the good TS'ers :) and TBM'ers but I reakon there more of a TS group. :)
my blaster will destroy u!
I try to stay out of these aruments for good reasons but I just want to correct something.
Our ratio is 10/0 not 9 we played TC but the war chat hasent been updated.
Not to be cocky but I agree with what DJ said, so it could be 11/0?
I dont really care.
And IMO the only one who can grab my attention is when AO says what are the top 5, other wise this is all opinian's.
So what DJ said in his previous post is that by the wins the order should be: UF, Fi, SA.
Thats according to the wins.
No, because the 2 wins were part of 1 war with 1 army. Experience plays a factor in it, too, and no surviving army has more than SA- the only army older is TT, and they're dead.
DJ Swings(SA),
I don't care about those freakin' record's. Your so called "Armies" hardly play and when challenged, we could'nt even get a responed from any of you except MA - all you challenge armies is by words like right now. Why would we try to have an Army when all of you could'nt do any S***! We could have owned you all with Chong in our army cause he's one of the best player's on TT. Too bad, none of you want him in your armies-why? Cause he is too much of a trouble maker? Why the hell do some of you hide behind other names and cause some trouble then - are you all too scared to do it or too afraid to get caught cause of the rules of your stinkin armies. Go ahead and challenge each other by words that u type here. Like I said if an army that hardly challenges or play's agianst other army's should be going down instead of staying on top of your so called "list of top 5 ". We could have owned you all if you did'nt wimp out on my request to challenge your so called "Armies". Agian, why try to have an army when you all can't do S***!!! Rock on! Rock hard!
</</div>
Wow... I counted the flies that entered your mouth during that long, tasteless tirade against grammar, and you're better off not knowing, because it would shock the hell out of you. Apparently, you were too busy talking trash to notice any of them. If you';re so cocky, revive HA and see how far it goes. SA's been up for 3 years... And HA?
3 years of talking trash...amazing and still can't challenge any other armies - huh!
Talk all the trash u want then cause this is the last you'll hear from me on this thread XD.
Rock on! Rock hard!
</</div>
In summation, the top armies are not going to battle the lower armies untill they prove they can be around more then a few mth, Most of them can't even get there army threads in order. And if I remember right SA and ST just had a war. UF had a war a few mths ago also with OC. DAS now in (FI) Has had wars also. If the newer armies want to have wars with the top armies then they need to get there acts together. VT was the last new army to really have a clue how to maintain what it takes to compete in a war. Any army below that has yet to achive any good statis with any top army. Why should any top army go to war with a bunch of other armies who most time don't show up, or there running around the game looking for there members to come join the war. And as far as Chong is concerned I promise you this, UF will war no army with him as a member. He has been mean and rude to almost everyone in tt and is just a foul mouthed punk. He is banned from ptt, so he can't even post on these forums.
@Woohoo,
You have some good friends here why have chong as one of them after he abuse's all of tt the way he does. Just because he plays a good game doesn't make him a worthy friend, because you know as well as I do he would turn on you in a second. And woo you know I helped you as much as I could with your army, I backed you up by making skins and telling ppl what a good army you had. Trying to get your army in a position to ask for wars with the top armies.
Last edited: Monday, July 31, 2006 at 10:32:52 AM
Yeah, we won't do anything for you guys until you prove you're worth our time. And besides, your own record shows you've talked more trash than all of us put together- even got silenced for it. I'd say Date Man was justified.
This is definetly my last post for GQ :) ,
I never mentioned Chong as being a friend. I like playing with him though and love beating him on scrum. I know you help me and still do, I thank you for it. I love helping out my friends whenever they get picked on in the games, too. I would always look at you as a friend, no matter what.;) No wonder other team's except MA did'nt want to challenge us with Chong in our team, maybe they did'nt want to get embarrassed when being owned. XD
Woohoo, over and out! B)
DJ Swiiiings,
...
</</div>
Last edited: Monday, July 31, 2006 at 11:09:47 AM
So, you're not even going to stick up for your own army? I can see why it died out.
Here's a lamer, there's a lamer, and another little lamer...
All u complaners im not on the list I dont complane
This is F-B (SD) JOIN SD!!!>>>>>>>>>(¯`ˇ._.ˇ[ƒ-ß]ˇ._.ˇ´¯)––––•(-•ƒãrtßÕ˙•-)•––––
It's not about whether we're on the list. Des put SA at #2, and that's not what I'm complaining about. I'm complaining that it wasn't made by a 3rd-party bystander, and to prove that even if I benefit from corruption, I'll still denounce it.
Welp M.I. Has challenged everyone I can find on this front page , do we need to challenge anyone else? DJ you seem to be the expert here, any suggestions dude? Aww heck just consider this to every army out there, we will be ready just let me know when you can be there.
Last edited: Thursday, August 10, 2006 at 6:00:54 AM
Des made this about a week before MI was started. In case nobody noticed, FB bumped it after 9 days. As for challenging people, if they turn you down or ignore you, that's their problem- they chickened out.
Thanks DJ XD
Bring it, wimps. I'm sure SA vs. MI'll be interesting, but I think I know the outcome (so much for sticking up for my clan).
DJ Swiiiiings, I can picture your face like this 
while your playing agianst MI.
</</div>
Hmm... No, looks more like your face would look if you weren't too much of a chicken to revive your army and go to war with them, just to prove your lameness... Oh, wait, that's impossible, you're too much of a p---y.
Its
1.UF
2.SA
3.FI
4.VT
5.MA/OC
L-3-a
6.KU
7.MI
8.WS?
I am proudly announced to say OC beat MA in a TBM war and we had a little argument afterwards so we came to a desicion. OC and MA are both in 5th place. I am so glad. :) If there's any other armys deservin to be in the place of WS plz say. (not SD till they buy the game)