Forums Index >> Armies >> Pathedic
Page : <1> :
KU has had 0 wars 0 practices yet there scrum team is 3rd or 4th best I think!! Mabe better then VT
^ actually, its about 6th.
Who says I can't be 12 and faster than all of you?
My point exactly 8( Quit talkin and start walkin!!!
Last edited: Saturday, August 12, 2006 at 7:03:29 PM
If you would notice closer, perhaps every army has some players on everyday, but those aren't necessarily the ones an army would want in a war. Take SA for example. We have perhaps half a dozen people that are on everyday (if even that). And who's to say we want those people in a war? It's either gonna be you battle at a moment's notice and have a semi-good battle, or wait a little for a quality battle. (Ya see, this is the summer time. People are on vacations. People have other things to do rather than play TT all the time. Wait until fall or winter comes around, and plenty of wars will start popping up.)
Then how about a fun game with anybody,deja your right all the army's/clans are scared to face MI
Jed you know I like you and respect you alot but man why have people in your army that your not going to use in a battle a war or even a scrimmage, Everyone in this army will fight, and Jed I say this with all respect to Sa and you my friend, but there is way to much talking and way to little fighting, it's like a kiddie club here. I hope I have not offended you buddy I have the utmost respect for you.
^ Your calling US the ones who dont go to war?
Your not serious.
US? We've played every SINGLE army out there at LEAST once, some twice, some three times.
Go say that to UF.
That's riiiiiiiight, I have'nt seen any tournament going on since I played TT(Team against Team). Not everyone is on vacation or do you have to have your leader there to hold your hand. There are alot of player's on some team's and I don't see why the available player's can't play against other team's or do you always have to have your leader there to play with you???3 on 3 or 4 on 4..etc..and there are like 10 or so player's on the team??? Why not let the player's that are available play for crying out loud! Let's see some games going on...it does'nt matter if you win or lose as long as you have some fun and quit whining. Quit fighting with the word's you post on other team's forums or making useless top five when all the team's never played against each other.
</</div>
^ I know what you mean exactly, there is too much talk. I never said everyone in SA won't fight in a war, because everyone gets their chance in a war. But against the best armies, you want the best players. Do you get what I'm saying here? For instance, SA might let all of its members fight a lesser army like OC (no offense to OC). But for a vet army, we want our very best to be shown. Not saying we can't play those other players, as they will most likely be our back-ups. That's why we (and other armies) have to take longer. Some of our best might be inactive at the moment, have something in life going on, etc.
P.S. No offense taken
Yes I understand what your saying Jed, but according to Destroyer his army can whoop us so I figured you would just send in the bench warmers against us ;) And this post is not rally aimed at Sa Jed you guys do more fighting than any of the armies here, maybe they could get off there lazy arse's and take some notes from SA XD
Someone should make a thread for schedules for team's to play and if they can not make it on the schduled date then reschedule it.
</</div>
Finaaaaallllllllllllyyyyyyy a great idea!!!!!!! Awesome idea, man I am going to make a schedule and they can show or no show, their choice.
What happened to the old woot? I liked him more.
Hmm... Maybe UF can war with MI some time, but that is up to the whole team not just me.
Anyway, I think the schedule is an interesting idea. Good luck with it. :)
Last edited: Saturday, August 12, 2006 at 9:08:15 PM
I disagree with the schedule thing. IMO, war times should be privately set, by the two armies at war. No need for the public to know about the war until it's over.
@Deja: Ah, no benchwarmers against you guys. Unlike Des, I don't underestimate opponents (perhaps overestimate sometimes, but never underestimate XD ).
EDIT: Grr, two posts before I made mine..
Last edited: Saturday, August 12, 2006 at 9:05:45 PM
Oooooooook lets not call them wars lets call the scimmages, if a army wants to show up I will make a slot for them and they can show, if not then we can always say they just couldn't get their poo poo together in time ;)
Typically, a War is best of three on several modes, like best of three TS, then best of three TBM, then if needed, best of three CTF. So yeah it could be like best of three in one mode.
This is interesting, in a good way.
Last edited: Saturday, August 12, 2006 at 10:22:19 PM
My point is this, when was the last time anyone battled or warred, man we spend more time in private servers doing nothing when we could get a few guys together and go at it In either ts tbm or ctf, this is not rocket science. And if we would all just real everyone is afraid of loosing and thats why its not done, fear, ack!!!!!!! Fear of loosing a status , paaaaaaaaaaalllllllllllleeeeeeaaaaaaassssseeeeee. Even if an army was to loose a battle at least they had the nuts to show up and do something rather than sitting around arguing who is ranked what.
@ Racer, dude I am the same exact guy don;t believe all the gossip your hearing, come talk to me so you can get more than the one sided slanted version. I still love ya dude and I think ya rock man, just know there are two sides to every coin buddy, don't be blinded by the one.
Last edited: Sunday, August 13, 2006 at 1:08:28 AM
@Deja Vu
You want war , I'll give you war, Let's play, my army challenge M.I to a Rock, scissor , paper war...
LET'S DO IT, next saturday at 9 Eastern PM, stinkyARMY V.S M.I , Rock , scissor, paper war...
LOL.. Too funny
^hilarious.
@Tanker
I beat you hands down yesterday. 6-3 to me in VT conference. Your KU's best scrummer. People in VT that are scrummers can beat you. KU is like 7th or 6th best scrummer people.
OC vs KU in a scrum war would sort of be easy. I"ll get ggg aka 123 aka moonlight so on so forth and he can beat me like 20-5 so I doubt you'd say your better than ggg. Sry had to get that of my tail he keeps saying he's better than me and I beat him all the time XD :).
MI I said in your thread OC will face you but it might be a long wait. Got loads of wars to sceduhal and on top of that got another army to look after. :)
my blaster will destroy u!
Looks like they are scared deja vu
WS hasnt had any wars, and its been around like aa whole month! XO
What are you complaining about Deja Vu????
I agree w/ the subject of the thread & the content. & I agree w/ jedirieb : Fi will never use me for a war against an old good army... Maybe that in wars we can make 2 fights : one w/ good players & one w/ low ranked players in an army ? I will ask to my leaders ;)
¤fully loaded satellites will conquer nothing but our minds¤
Like a class and b class?
I'm with Deja on this.
@Gamera, I dont think you need an a or b class (I would probably rank c :P) but a scrimmage you can send anyone into. VT had a scrimmage against MI last week. 2 of the 4 on VT had never team scrummed before (thanks for the bumps and bruises MI!!!!!) But it was good experience for me and some other guys that normally wouldn't get to go to war.
I've got a fever, and the only prescription, is more cowbell.
I was asking @ure if thats what he meant but why would you rank yourself a c?
@ Smacky, dude anytime you guys wanna get together durring the day 2 on 2 ro 3 on 3 man we can do that, shoot we will even split up the teams, it does no one any good to just kill a team all the time. I think some folks got a bad atttitude about Chong and he is just a damn good all around player and he knows it. So anytime you guys wanna leave the bm server and come do some scrum man we are up for it.
@ gamera & wOOt like you said : a classe & b classe. Only for armies w/ enough players... Or another idea : in a 4 on 4 : both armies choose 2 players & propose 3 players('low ranked'). The other army choose 2 of the 3 proposed players... So it gives chances to both armies & a part of luck/unintended...
¤fully loaded satellites will conquer nothing but our minds¤
You don't need to complicate things with additional classes or anything like that. You are missing the point.
You want to go to an official war, take you best guys. Otherwise set up a scrimmage where the results aren't counted and bragging rights are not on the line. Have anyone that is available from your army show up. Get some work in....practice some tactics against people from another army. Kind of like a preseason war.
@Gamera, I was just kidding about the C ranking. Self depricating humor works best for me. The delivery would have been better in person :P
@Deja, I will see if I can get Spirit or Vig to round up some guys for another scrimmage late this week. We'll make sure peeps stick around longer this time.
I've got a fever, and the only prescription, is more cowbell.
@ UM-VT- My idea is not to complicate too much the things : just to get more fun for ALL plyers of an army...& introducing a little more stake in game...
Take you best guys
Here is the problem we place here : an army only could have 6 players : 4 for playin & 2 in replacement...So is that the reality ? I think not. What I propose I just an alternative solution for big armies...
@uré
Tryin to be good in the best
¤fully loaded satellites will conquer nothing but our minds¤
Page : <1> :
: :
M.I. Has been hear for almost 2 weeks now and the only army that has even scrimmaged us is VT, hats off to them. I have no clue as to what takes so long to get a war or a battle going especially when I see most members either in Roo's Lep's or Dash's everyday. How in the world can you rank squat when no one plays each other, this is a friggin club for posting. The only army that has even bothered to battle is VT. Hats off to you guys again, the rest of ya are just posting we are ranked this or that, man get out of the thread and lets get it on, or could it be your afraid your going to loose your precious spot. People say all we want to do is be the best, that would be correct. Why in the world would anyone want to strive to be mediocre? Did you create your army so you could be second best? Third best? Forth best? Hell keep me ranked 8th for all I care but lets war, this is just stuuuuuuuuuuuupid, sittin here making pretty threads is just a waste of good tt time.
Sooooo anyone got the nuts to come up against M.I. Yet?